InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,631.89
(
0.85%
)
US TECH 100
19,854.00
(
0.90%
)
Dow Jones
39,975.11
(
0.56%
)
Brent Oil
85.34
(
0.26%
)
Bitcoin
57,830.82
(
0.83%
)
Post# of 14330
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Tamaman

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 0
Posts 395
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2013

Tamaman

Re: dano9008 post# 3774

Friday, 02/22/2013 4:06:17 PM

Friday, February 22, 2013 4:06:17 PM

Post# of 14330
If the value wasn't there I don't think there would be 6 interested parties...I also believe hollister reserves were cut do to the proceedings which I would believe would be more strict on reserves/developments...why build a processing plant for such little reserves? the potential is there I believe and interested parties know this I would assume...anyways your concern is my only concern and that is if the valuation of Burnstone holds true...lets hope it does
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up