"Quote:.....This case seems to be stuck on the decision making process of when, or where, to make the switch, and not the switch itself. This case (and the judge too for that matter) has focused on the wrong thing. So far it has been about whether or not the phone should make the switch. I believe the core of the matter should be the "seamless switch" itself. End Quote... My reason for buying into this stock was the seamless switch. Maybe I need to sue the judge for overlooking that fact! I bought in here for the reason of no interruptions in a call!! I could care less at what range the switch is made, so what the hell Did I miss all these years???"
Nothing. What has happened is that to date TM's lawyers have beaten the crap out of our lawyers, in part by rewriting our own patent to favor TM. That's not easy.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.