InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 6914
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2003

Re: Rocket_173 post# 24364

Friday, 11/11/2005 10:57:25 PM

Friday, November 11, 2005 10:57:25 PM

Post# of 64738
The idea that DR Chen did not speak at the vaccine conference because CYGX did not want its intellectual property to get in the hands of someone who could connect the dots and copy the technology does not seem plausible to me for the following reasons.

1 The technology is protected by a pending patent that has been filed.
http://cytogenix.com/en_us/Company/pr_dnaManufacture.html

2 The company is actively trying to sell the technology as per this site.
http://pharmalicensing.com/company/showall/4434/Opportunities


3 The vaccine conference would have been a great place to introduce the technology to potential customers.

The most worrying thing to me is that Dr Chen was not at the conference and that CYGX has not been abel to sell the syn DNA technology for almost a year now.



"If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts."

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.