InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 295
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/01/2012

Re: paige386 post# 215342

Tuesday, 02/19/2013 11:03:32 AM

Tuesday, February 19, 2013 11:03:32 AM

Post# of 312016
No Toxins? How do you know? I don't see any FUEL TOX. TEST referenced or in any public record, corporate, governmental, ANYWHERE... as far as coco paving, I bet the "fuel" is being used as blacktop additive. SO YOU KNOW transportation diesel is #2 NOT #6

LOOK at the TRUCK PLACARD !!! NOT DIESEL !!! NAPTHA !!!
PLASTiC - clearly shiny vinyl chlorinated plastic. Milk crate = chlorinated plastic for strength !!!
JBI PHOTOS

The JBI PR reporting the SAIC audit/review, as it appears on the JBI website, said this:
"During the 3-day audit, the P2O processor ran in continuous mode, with 121,318 pounds of throughput, producing 10,287 gallons of No. 6 Fuel and 4,269 gallons of Naphtha."

The SAIC Executive Summary, judged by JBI for unstated reasons to be unreliable, said this:
"During this period, the unit processed 121,318 pounds of waste plastic feedstock and produced 10,287 and 4,269 gallons of fuel oil no. 6 and naphtha, respectively."
We must assume that the unreliability of the Summary isn't related to this data given that it is the same as that which appears in their own PR.

What we can't assume is the nature of the "throughput" or "waste plastic feedstock" material. It's a shame that that information was left out of the press release.
We don't know what feedstock they used for the test and, except for the meager amount of "cow plastic", we don't know what they are using now. Renders any attempts to analyze REAL yield and earnings potential a waste of time.