Thanks In XS, support appreciated. As with your posts, hopefully my recent posts are also understood as attempts to bring counter-balance to what are considered, at least imo, to be overstatements. It is not that the claims might never prove to be true, just that there is no evidence today showing that they will prove to be true.
I see this much like the causes behind the establishing of the rigorous definitions behind NI compliant reporting. It is easy to state things that have not been proved, and as long as those things have not been contradicted by fact the statements of course cannot be refuted as untrue. In science this is the error of assuming that a hypothesis, unproved, is the fact of the matter.
JMO