InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 3893
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/28/2005

Re: pennstreet post# 39371

Wednesday, 02/13/2013 5:52:57 PM

Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:52:57 PM

Post# of 45771
"There was ABSOLUTELY no reason the 3 mentioned above could not have agreed with the other 15. NOT ONE REASON."

Plain and simply fact:

THEY WANTED THE CASH WHICH THEY WERE LEGALLY OWED, NOT WORTHLESS SHARES THAT BECAME DEVALUED BY 50% AS SOON AS THEY WERE ISSUED.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.