General European Strategic Invt's Inc (GESI)

[Flat Foot]

Wrong~Real Lab Results are issued directly from-the Lab to
the company who paid for there services.

Real Lab results aren't some copy and pasted document.

Seriously?

Here are some misguiding statements about GESI and the IET Technology they have chosen.

investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=84195161

“That's a poor example ~ not even close.
The so called Lab tests were completed on approximately
18 rail road ties or 1.6 tons mixed with oil?? LMAO!!!”

I AGREE THAT IS HILLARIOUS TO ACTUALLY BELIEVE THEY NEED TO HAVE A BIGGER SAMPLE TO BE ABLE TO SEE THE RESULTS. IT’S CALLED SCIENCE AND THE ABILITY TO COMPOUND FIGURES TO SEE WHAT A LARGER SAMPLE WOULD DO.
Here is how the test are done.

http://www.inrefco.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Air-Emission-and-Ash-Quality-Testing-Results.pdf

The USEPA has three levels of emission quality, depending on the amount of waste processed per day.
The standards shown are for the most restrictive limits, for municipal solid waste combustors with daily
processing capacities of greater than 250 tons.
The values shown are the mathematical average of the various samples collected and measured during
the testing series indicated.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=84187451

“Are you implying that the
inREFco doc with the third party
lab results is equivalent to the EPA approving gasification of rail road ties or other MSW in the U.S.A.?”


WELL THEY USE THIRD PARTY SOURCES FOR A REASON SO YES.
All tests were performed by third party laboratories, certified to conduct these tests.

http://www.inrefco.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Air-Emission-and-Ash-Quality-Testing-Results.pdf