InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 339
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/10/2011

Re: mikeg2 post# 17055

Tuesday, 02/05/2013 5:35:06 PM

Tuesday, February 05, 2013 5:35:06 PM

Post# of 28688
I have some SERIOUS doubts that that letter is authentic and actually conferred to the court.

Someone providing a character reference in a trial like this usually appears in person before the judge if at all possible, if indeed jailing or not jailing the accused is as important as the reference claims.

And it is not at all well-written, it is arrogant and full of hubris. Imagine a judge reading that! Any judge where I come from would give JB the MAXIMUM POSSIBLE SENTENCE just to spite the arrogance in that letter and the thinking the writer can sway the judge. "So JB will go to China if I don't release him? F*** that, let him consider it while in JAIL," most judges would say.

Judges don't like to be told what to do, or even suggested.

I do not like this letter even if it is real, which is yet to be proven. It could have been written so much better -- with humility and yet still getting the essential points across.

We'll see.

And JB's lawyer would KNOW what I'm saying and NEVER let such a letter through unless it was written in just the right way. Lawyers know their local judges well and know what would go over well and what would not.

BobEye, what is the specific source of the email that this letter was attached to (if you can say)?