InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 752
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/12/2012

Re: None

Tuesday, 02/05/2013 10:47:40 AM

Tuesday, February 05, 2013 10:47:40 AM

Post# of 33394
CIRC WINS IN CALIFORNIA

I was just reading the ruling in CA and realized that the case was won by CIRC NOT because of CA law.....rather because of THE LICENCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN PLAY BEV & PLAYBOY. Paragraph below.

My point...this is the 2nd Judge to rule in favor of CIRC and the courts are saying that there is in fact a legal & binding AGREEMENT...which means that since there IS an agreement Playboy DEFINITELY breached that agreement.

What do you guys think about this?? GAME SET MATCH!!
---------------------------------------------------------------
In an order issued January 30, 2013, U.S. District Judge S. James Otero ruled in favor of Play Beverages and CirTran in declining to enjoin Play Beverages from selling the Playboy Energy Drink. Judge Otero granted Play Beverages’ motion to dismiss the case without prejudice, finding that Playboy’s lawsuit was inappropriate under the forum selection clause of the License Agreement between Play Beverages and Playboy. Judge Otero ruled that Playboy could not bring its claims in California.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CIRX News