Secure Point Technologies Inc (fka IMSCQ)

[Imperial Whazoo]

Tripe.

And saying I'm arguing both sides is nothing more than a false accusation that adds nothing to this discussion, IMHO.

It does give me an oppurtunity to repeatedly drive home the actual point of view I think people have an interest in getting to see. For this, thanx! LOL

:o)

As to what is actually important, see my last post, which is about the difference between the "Qualified" and "Approved" lists.

As regards this nonsense of "arguing both sides", I am not, and IMHO, your accusation is tripe, LOL.

I've only one side and I argue it only.

Here it is, once again:

There is not going to be any inhibition of consideration by companies that bought older technology, which is what you said that I originally disagreed with. You are just wrong in that view, IMHO. Simple as that.

Secondly, old technology will not get discarded, and no amount of putting that ridiculous sentiment into my mouth will establish it as my point of view. It simply is not what I ever held to be the case here.

Period.

And thirdly, there will not be a rush that has everyone who had bought in the past replacing what they bought at a sprinters pace. There will be buyers, but this allegation that I ever said there is going to be wholesale discarding of past purchases, or that this "discarding" will happen in a rush, I never said any such thing.

Period. I never held that to be the case, despite it having occured that somebody put those words into my mouth.

I never held this view at all and my actual view is that there will be buys from orders waiting in the wings and there will be lots of "onesy-twosy" test unit buys.

I could not have been more clear on any of this, and none of it is "arguing both sides of the same issue", which is what you just posted.

That is tripe.

Look, for example, at my last post, which was about the actual risk involved here. The actual risk of being on the "approved" list rather than on the "Qualified" list.

It is tripe to say I'm arguing both sides of this matter. Just check the last post I just made.

Nothing could be clearer than the stances I'm taking, and it does not matter how my points are incorrectly represented.

Just read my latest post.

No taking of two sides in that post, is there? And there never has been. No false representations of anyone's views, either.
I have no axe to grind and all I want to do is help clearly evaluate this company's new status as regards the TSA.

I want it to stop... this sophistry & all this attacking of me via misrepresentations of my point of view.

One thing all this has accomplished is this: I get to fight for truth, which I don't mind doing, and I get to show that I refuse to stoop to putting false wording into other people's mouths.

And I welcome the chance to repeatedly re-make my actual arguments, LOL.

My hope is that, by taking the time to do so, I'm helping folks actually think this thing thru.

:o)

Imperial Whazoo