CO2 Tech Ltd (fka CTTD)

[samsamsamiam]

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2013/lr22604.htm
Litigation Release No. 22604 / January 29, 2013
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jonathan R. Curshen, et al., Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-20561 (S.D. Fla.) (JLK)
Yitzchak Zigdon Settles SEC Fraud Charges
On January 23, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida entered a final judgment by consent against Yitzchak Zigdon in the SEC's enforcement action against seven defendants concerning the common stock of CO2 Tech Ltd. The final judgment enjoins Zigdon from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Court also ordered Zigdon to pay disgorgement of $260,000, prejudgment interest of $74,516 and a civil penalty in the amount of $130,000 for a total of $464,516 in monetary sanctions. In addition, the Court barred Zigdon from participating in an offering of penny stock. Zigdon consented to the entry of the final judgment without admitting or denying any of the allegations of the Commission's Complaint.

According to the Commission's complaint filed in February of 2011, the defendants' coordinated misconduct enabled them to sell CO2 Tech stock at artificially inflated prices, resulting in profits of over $7 million. In the complaint, the Commission alleged that CO2 Tech Ltd. was a sham company without significant assets or operations whose stock prices were quoted in the Pink Sheets. According to the complaint, among other things, Zigdon provided the paper work necessary to establish the account that was used to dump the shares of CO2 Tech on to the market. The complaint also stated that he caused materially false and misleading information about CO2 Tech to be disseminated in press releases and on its website. In particular, the complaint alleged that CO2 Tech falsely touted business relationships that the company had not formed, including a relationship with the Boeing Company when, in fact, there had been no communications, correspondence or understandings between CO2 Tech and Boeing.

For more information about this matter, see Litigation Release No. 21862, WL 576828 (February 18, 2011) and Release No. 34-65799, WL 5834265 (November 21, 2011).


http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2013/lr22604.htm