InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 48
Posts 2221
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/28/2013

Re: JJSeabrook post# 26316

Monday, 02/04/2013 11:57:11 AM

Monday, February 04, 2013 11:57:11 AM

Post# of 68424
JJ, appreciate the response. I guess, ultimately, what we as shareholders should be aware of is that there was something about the nature of 835 that enabled JJ (not you, but your bizarro-world counterpart who wields the gavel) to rule as soon as opposition briefs were filed.

The question is: Are you aware as to whether any of the other remaining outstanding motions may also possess similar characteristics (i.e. may potentially be ruled on prior to the 2/15 reply brief date that most of us have been mentally targeting in our heads)?

As always, thanks for sharing your knowledge...