PGG: The BioBS post was deleted for reasons not clear. Anyone? The BioBS post was well-tailored but somewhat unorthodox...borderline heretical for PPHM stalworths. The BioBS post, in a nutshell, listed parallel expectations by expert PPHM Ih ub posters here, and by perceived experts posting for another biotech board, and the latter biotech crashed and burned despite all the positive crystal "balling" at this stage of development. BioBS's post was excellent because of the penmanship quality AND the reasoning, and seemed, skim-reading, no Ih ub rules were broken. My money is not on that side of the bet, so I can see how the five most assertively expert posters here might find comparing PPHM to a recent biotech wreckage offensive, he could conceivably be correct, and is definitely entitled to his point of view. BioBS asserted in post 110191 that he thinks Cotara will be kept "in house", and that could also be true because no fish are jumping out of the water to snap it up. The "Cotara reality" is closely tied to China. If China interests want it, they will have it. I've said here every three months, when all the big money interests are maneuvered into place for appropriately appeased greed, PPHM stock will be allowed to float free...and not until. I continue to believe that phospholipid membrane science has a place on the treatment table, as does an I131 delivery system. If diagnosed with lung cancer I would do my best to receive both Bavi AND Cotara. cheers!
