Secure Point Technologies Inc (fka IMSCQ)

[Imperial Whazoo]

Again, my argument is not that they will rush out immediately.

My argument is that the former decisions to buy will not inhibit reviewing and revisiting.

And, I added a quote section to my prior post, which points out the congnitive dissonance in saying that I take the position that all of the buying will be this year.

I asserted no such "immediacy" or "this year" timeline.

I am only arguing that they will in no way be stopped from looking at Implant simply because they looked around and spent some money last year.

"This year" and "Immediately" are injected wordings.... they are not my wordings.

I take a better stance that insists that, like Implant's management team, the timeline will not be predictable, but what is of key importance is that the past inavailability (and the past purchasing) will not prevent reviewiwing the matter and it will not inhibit finding money to, at the very least, begin evaluating with limited unit purchases.

I think onesy-twosy units will abound as "testing" units in companies and governmental entities thatm made other sdecisions prior to the availability of Implant's superior technology.

The problem is that it is asserted that the prior buyers will not look at it again because money was spent last year.

I NEVER intended to be understood to have held that purchases would be "IMMEDIATE" or "this calendar year".

My key issue is with the error of cointending that prior buyers will not look at this technology since they have made purchases in prior years. I think this is especially wrong since Implant's technology is like no other out there.

What someone looked for last year (and before) could not be found, but it is now out there and I contend that they will not let the prior unavailability stop them from looking seriously at it.

Given the pace at which technology is progressing, it is patendly absurd to say that companies will not constantly be out there, beating the bushes, to see if there is something on the market that was not out there last year, and I contend that this is exactly what companies will be doing.

Former buying decisions, therefore, will not inhibit revisiting this matter.

As to loaded words like "immediate" and "this year", I have not contended that either is true. I load no timelines on my point of view.

I merely argue that it will get looked at and that last year's buying will not prevent demand.

There is a very imnportant difference here.

Imperial Whazoo