Secure Point Technologies Inc (fka IMSCQ)

[Imperial Whazoo]

I've done the best I could to explain this: Implant's solution the only solution of its kind. It has no equal. This is attested to by the stance of the TSA (re-listen to the CC.... its there).

The issue is simple: UPGRADES WILL BE NECESSARY & last year's spending will not inhibit spending on it. It will be necessary and as such, money will find its way into budgets.

The very nature of this technology sets it apart as a necessity and it is imprecise & misleading to characterize it as a mere replacement to the former solutions that were out there before.

Its a necesary upgrade and the buyers of former solutions will find the budget.

You insist that we should all view the matter of the necessity of upgrading to the needed technology in this war on terror as though it is just a decision as to whether to "replace".

If I think it might help to summarize the above points, I'm able to summarize what I've said in a manner that is not misleading, thank you very much. IMHO, it creates cognitive dissonance to suggest that decisions made to buy inferior solutions last year will not be reviewed. You insist that we all doubt there will be demand driven by the necessity of upgrading. I disagree.

"Replacement" will not impede buying because Implant's soulution is not a mere "replacement". Its an UPGRADE & a necessity.

It has no equal.

And like I pointed out, corporate executives and government officials are not going to want to be facing depositions after some disaster where they have to admit that they failed to buy the necessary upgrade because they spent money on an inferior solution in some former budget year. Thats not the way "cover your ass" decisions, especially in the War on Terror, are made.

The buyers who made decisions to go for what was available last year will be buyers of this necessary "upgrade", and they will find the money because the superiority of Implant's solution will demand that the budgets accomodate upgrading. Simple as that.

Oh and let me be clear: I never realized you would insist that all this buying would be this year. My position is not time loaded. Not "this year", as you inaccurately stated my position is.

It is exactly like they said in the CC: I can not and will not be dragged into putting a "this year" date on the decision. You imprecisely state that I take this position. I do not.

I have no more idea when the trigger will be pulled than the Implant management team does, but I know for a fact that this technology has no peer, and as such, the decision to review a proir decision to get an inferior solution will not prevent the reveiw of the buying decision, and the superiority of this solution will eventually drive a widespread buying buy both formerly interested parties and new entities who are looking for the first time.

As to my arguing anymore, I've said all that needs to be said and I'm right about it.

I'm outta here.

Peace everybody, and just watch the thing climb in the weeks to come.

From this point on, I'll devote my posts to the matter of the chart

Peace... cognitive dissonance notwithstanding, LOL.

Imperial Whazoo