InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 55
Posts 5266
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2011

Re: None

Thursday, 01/31/2013 12:05:31 PM

Thursday, January 31, 2013 12:05:31 PM

Post# of 241056
Just a reminder to myself and others. You know...I think this Eric is probably a pretty good guy. Very personable and probably a great boss to work for. I also believe he is dedicated, passionate and driven to make this company succeed and wanting desperately to bring a branding quality to this that matches the product performance. I think he had best intentions with all his loyals and used that "transparency" attribute so often talked about in the past as a vehicle to keep the shareholder informed. I'm also certain I have missed many attributes regarding his personal qualities.

But as we know no one is here for a popularity contest. The value of having a nice guy as a CEO is great. But that CEO has got to have the talent, planning and corporate steering attributes, vision, good cash mangmnt skills, that coincide with branding measures of accomplishments. He needs to understand theres an end game of cash available to ultimately work with to execute his plan. He has always got to keep the creation of shareholder value as his primary focus. He is held to measurable results that show the measures of his planning and accomplishment skills (i.e.the financials). You can't take part and parcel of this list because all points have dollars connected to them. Its my opinion based on the results that this CEO has attained in his tenure of running this company that he hasn't the talented skills to do what/ was, or needs to be accomplished to bring about shareholder value. I use this criteria to make certain my opinions have sound backing that can be understood. I don't want anyone hurt or to lose money as has happened here. Not a good one...but none the less a learning experience about how pinky's operate and those who run them is being experienced.

All JMO!