InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 97
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/23/2012

Re: surfkast post# 717

Monday, 01/28/2013 8:43:10 AM

Monday, January 28, 2013 8:43:10 AM

Post# of 21833
New Products Violates Non Circumvent Agreement with VTMS as demonstrated by email below.

On 11/18/2010 2:29 PM, James wrote:
> i was talking about my company doing some marketing and sales for you but if approved then i would have to run through vtms per my agreements with them. i have not discussed this with ed, but just saying that next year i may be interested in expanding whats on my site and if so then there would be a possible discussion. i still think that a deal that was discuss with ed is still the best route to go
> On Nov 18, 2010, at 1:14 PM, wrote:
>> Dear James,
>>
>>
>> In conversations with Ed/VTMS he never gave me the impression
>> he would be interested in a Marketing Agreement of our products.
>> It always related to an "ownership" concept plus us our coming up
>> with cash.
>>
>>
>> I will keep in touch, but that is the "rub".
>>
>>
>> If you have input as to put other options on the table, that
>> could have merit, I am open to discussion. Last conversaions did not go that way.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> John
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "James
>> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 12:46:35 PM
>> Subject: Re: EMGE-Follow-up
>>
>> d not be a starnger becasue i am developing a new website that wl go live in the new year. it is going to be big and would like to discuss opportunities for your products thru my ecommerce site. all this must run thru vtms of course
>> regards
>> james f