InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 22
Posts 1379
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/30/2003

Re: cestlavie post# 575

Sunday, 11/06/2005 9:20:23 AM

Sunday, November 06, 2005 9:20:23 AM

Post# of 14027
Cestlavie, you've got me confused.

I was saying that, from what I recall, the SEC charges were not against Mike King. I just again searched this document

http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/testarchive/1999/tsty0699.txt

with both Google's word search, and Ctrl+F on my machine and find no mention of Mike King.

But I could certainly be wrong. If you've found something, please post the excerpt from Mike King and a link to where it can be found.

Your reference to "page 2" and "the root directory" almost makes it sound like you're referring to Mike King's website. There's no dispute about that being Mike King's website. The question is whether or not Mike King's Princeton Research (a Nevada corp) is the same as, or related to, the Princton Research that the SEC charged, which was Savage out of Florida.

The timeline is such that I suppose King could have been working with Savage's Princeton Research in Florida and then, when it dissolved, King went to start Princeton Research in Nevada. But I see no evidence of that.

Help me out. What specifically are you talking about? Please post a link to the page you're referring to.