InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 336
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/10/2010

Re: loanranger post# 211988

Friday, 01/25/2013 10:23:23 AM

Friday, January 25, 2013 10:23:23 AM

Post# of 312015
I did not "ignore" the context of your post. It simply wasn't worth the effort to respond to the remainder of it. My point, which you apparently do not "get," is that the litigation costs would have far exceeded the cost to settle, making settlement the obvious choice. Settlement is not an admission of liability, period. The fact that an injunction is agreed upon as part of the settlement does not change that fact.

Sometimes settlement makes sense from a practical standpoint. This case was one of them.