Friday, January 25, 2013 12:11:05 AM
^ How on earth is an agreed upon injunction not to do things that are already violations of law a "common sense" indicator that "there actually were bad acts" done in the past? If you agree not to violate a law, common sense says you have already violated that law? That makes no sense at all.
^ The litigation costs would have far exceeded this "staggering" fine you speak of. Ask any major SEC litigation defense firm in the Boston area (i.e., in the jurisdiction where this was pending), and I am confident you will be told the same.
FEATURED ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) First US Trial of IQ Nano Drone for Inventory Management • Oct 15, 2024 8:21 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Strategic Progress and Corporate Evolution • KGKG • Oct 15, 2024 9:00 AM
One World Products Secures First Order for Hemp-Based Reusable Containers, Pioneers Renewable Materials for the Automotive Industry • OWPC • Oct 15, 2024 8:35 AM
CBD Life Sciences, Inc. Announces Strategic MOU with U.S. Armed Forces for Groundbreaking Mushroom Supplement • CBDL • Oct 15, 2024 8:00 AM
HealthLynked Files Non-Provisional Patent for AI-Powered Healthcare Assistant, ARi • HLYK • Oct 15, 2024 8:00 AM
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM