AJ,
I would have complied if I didn't feel I had a right to defend myself against untrue posts against me. I think you owe me that.
And you said this:
Posted by: ajtj99
In reply to: The Freep who wrote msg# 63504 Date:11/3/2005 7:48:10 AM
Post #of 63877
"Freep, burk's opinion is that of Bob Brinker, so he is truthful when he says it has nothing to do with charts as far as he is concerned."
1. As I already mentioned, there was "1" market day between Freep's challenge and me accepting it. So, there was no "chart" involved. I viewed your post as "taunting" me for not following the "charts" during that whole one day....all while not being able to defend myself because I was already banned for two weeks. You may think that is fair. If you do, then it's fair that I call your integrity into question. Don't try and be an angel about it.
2. You have no idea if "Brinker" is inolved in my market view just as I have no idea if you only use head and shoulder calculations in your market calls. As I understand it, Brinker made a market call in March of 2003. He did not make a market call in April of 05 and nor did he make a call of a bottom in Oct. of 05.
3. So, your assertion above I took, and still take, as a misrepresentation. Anyone can see that.
So don't try and play Mr. Goodie Two Shoes with me. Facts are facts. I have a right to defend myself in the light of what I preceive to be false allegations...even if you consider them trivial.
AI
