I baffled too. If the play had solid legs with no drawbacks, then you would think the old pros could ignore the intelligent questions and let it run. The viciousness of the diatribe tells me more than the total sum of the geology, in error in method or no. What someone else has said about this board is that any stock with a mindless cheerleader goonsquad has to have less than authoritative credentials and is suspect right away. I tend to aver, but am not so confident that the company is necessarily totally disparagable, although some of their supporters perhaps expect too much from the third tier buying public. Can they be that nervous about the stock support levels? Do they need to dump their stock at say 25% higher gain so badly? It is rather thinly traded for what would otherwise be a robust play. Is the Phillipine a discount factor? Seems people run to Peru, and China, whilst strangely again ignoring substantial gold plays in Africa.
I must admit it is a mystery. I have come to expec this kind of behaviour from the promoters of IPMCF, but does SUR need it?
Perhaps the needle artists need me. Perhaps they are short the stock, and need my rising to the smelly bait to set the stage for the plug pulling they know is imminent down the road. Short every mining stock on the board and 98% of the time you will make money. Less than 2% are winners to the end. If you can afford to hold, and double up your shorts, given max 2 years you will win, and win big "every time". All the insiders know this. This makes brokerages the biggest shorters of mining stock around. And most of the people who post on these boards post monday to friday 9-5. That puts them square in IR and brokerage offices. They ain't retirees at the bucket shop. Those guys still don't use computers, 90%.
EC<:-}
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
