Fortress Financial Group fka FFGO

[OldBen]

I agree that FFGO and other OTC companies have a harder time organizing against any criminal NSS or other actions. The legal "hassle and risk" for large companies are a good thing because it draws more attention to any wrongdoings. Which is what we need at FFGO. Attention. A revocation is public and draws attention. It doesn't highlight any NSS. It doesn't fight NSS. It locks it up in a box. I would rather draw legal and political attention to it, allow a company to trade and have the DTCC or other entities force them to cover the shorted shares. I imagine that you will tell me that the revocation is a tool to force the coverage of NSS shares to occur AT THE DIVIDEND price. First, there must be a dividend. Next, they would have to acknowledge the NSS. Finally, the NSS holders would have to be forced to cover at this price.

I am not sure how a revocation makes all the above conditions more likely to occur?