InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 462
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/18/2012

Re: goroyce post# 113181

Wednesday, 01/23/2013 8:57:34 AM

Wednesday, January 23, 2013 8:57:34 AM

Post# of 116986
I agree on the majority of what you're saying.

1. Yes, we need to stay together.
2. Yes, regardless of tomorrow's outcome, we still have the SEC.
3. The SEC will make or break our case for us. I have my opinion on that.
4. Yes, they're are playing legal Russian Roulette. Asking us to take 2% of what? That's like you agreeing to pay for a new car not knowing what they're delivering to you.
5. I know I have been on the road a lot and perhaps missed a few things but this doesn't seem legal. One would think the structured plan detailing the 2% of what value would be listed?

6 MOST IMPORTANT: In my opinion only, They have some deal on the table for approval of which at least I personally have not seen yet. If we say NO, the plan could still be approved and we could possibly lose everything. 2% of some working Corporation is better than NOTHING. I agree with you that they're low balling however this is worded better than before. Prior to this it was a possible 2%. For me, personally, I will not oppose only for the fact of getting something rather than nothing in hopes of future growth.

If someone has the details of the plan as in regards to the values, please let me know. I had to add some Stickies today but it only allows 4.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent PTIX News