1. re : forward looking statements- As I read the link you provided it specifically refers to problems not disclosed.We seem to be looking at the same information and getting different understanding. Company itself has provided forward looking information by predicting production in September/October. My questions have only been where is the sort of basic information that almost always accompanies such forward looking statements.( In any case, also you can compare SEC Guide 7 to the company 10k/10q filings whether they are disclosing according to those guidelines). I am not sure why this is a problem for company to disclose.
2. re IR - My comment was that with a company so close to production with a weak share price, perhaps they need an IR person.As far as CFO doing things his own way, well that is nice, but in final analysis it should be judged against success- and certainly if he is inexperienced in this industry it wouldn't hurt looking at how typically such information is presented: that might be precisely why there are so many questions.Kind of interesting- seems if shareholders ask questions, it seems resented and then shareholders told to go elswhere.Supposedly Guyer works for the shareholders no ?
Look, I already wrote I remain convinced this is a 1 to 6 month speculative play. I am trying to determine whether it may be a worthwhile investment in a larger amount. If you review my posts I believe they have not been bashing the company but asking relevant questions. Why do I get the distinct impression my questions seem to hit a nerve ? These guys control a mill,and apparently have some potential resources that at some point could be mined as well as custom milling potential- gretsa potential there whether it would happen in 2013 or 2014.
