InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 51
Posts 1681
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/15/2007

Re: pacemakernj post# 108600

Saturday, 01/19/2013 12:55:19 PM

Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:55:19 PM

Post# of 345953
This so called rule is totally meaningless. There must have been hundreds of phase III cancer trials over the past 10 years, and yet they pick out 58 to include in their "rule". What about the rest of them? What would the statistics be if they included more than 58, or all of them? Sounds to me like they picked out the 58 so that their "rule" was sure to be "proved". Could there be bias involved here?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News