DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[frogdreaming]

While not wishing to interfere in Dr Frudaky's conversation, I do think that you are missing the point.

The essential question posed by the good Doctor was; Why did they sell their company and all of it's 'apparently' valuable assets for a mere $21,500.00?

I say 'apparently' based on the frenzy of applause generated by this board in regard to the acquisition.

The Doctor went on to propose that it could NOT have been a desire to obtain DNAG stock that was the motivation for their sale price as they could have just as easily obtained the same stock on the open market WITHOUT having to surrender their technology.

To rephrase the question then, how is the apparent disconect in value explained? Is the technology valuable? If so, how could it be obtained for less than the cost of a used car? Are the principles competent and capable? If so, why did they surrender their accomplishments for peanuts?

Hope this helps.
frog