InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 861
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2009

Re: None

Tuesday, 01/08/2013 7:03:31 AM

Tuesday, January 08, 2013 7:03:31 AM

Post# of 92948
feeexcited aabout the two days of significant upward movement.
At the same time, my alarm bells start ringing reminding me that these jumps happen followed by a disappointing drop back to the startng point, sometimes lower.
I remember when NIH approved the line for ACTC. I also remember when people hear were talking about the December 6th NIH meeting in 2012 during which people said they were going to decide or at least discuss ACTC's lines and also decide about the redefinition. Neither topic was outlined in a PR so what does that mean... at best, they wanted to continue the decision until the S vs S decision which was announced yesterday. I hope this frees up NIH to follow through with the redefinition. Even so, ACTC has be vocal that they do not need NIH funding to proceed with the trials though I am sure it would be nice for share holders because it would constitute non-dilutive funding.
I also remember GR stating that they would submit the NDA but the end of the year? DId that happen? I can't remember...
So I guess for myself, if anyone is familiar with testing, I try to keep my excitment and my disappoint limited to one standard deviation so that I can experience the fortune without letting it take me too far into my doubt.
I am always routing for this company and its research... butjust trying to stay present with it...
For what its worth...
CW

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.