This is a reprint of earlier comments from a HTI exec. It confirms my communications with many EPA supervisors about their interests in HHO (none) and their exposure to it by private companies (none).
HTI exec comments...
"That having been said, this is not 1984 and I am not George Orwell. I will not police the thoughts of others. There is no one on I-Hub, Raging Bull, Silicon Investor, or any myriad of other sites that speaks for this company. We do not post on these sites and do not police them. Statements of this company come directly from this company. As posters on those sites like to remain anonymous, the only way I would be able to communicate with them would be to actually post on I-Hub. This, I will not do."
"Now then, that having been said, if you truly believe in doing due diligence, perhaps you can ferret out why it is that the EPA apparently is not actively testing hydrogen while the US Dept of Transportation boasts of many successful applications for the enhancement of diesel engines by the use of hydrogen? The two are diametrically opposite on the same points. If you truly investigate hydrogen you will learn that the EPA is presently using test procedures which do not include hydrogen as a variable. If you do indeed talk to the EPA gurus you will also learn that they are not totally opposed to the use, they are just waiting for someone to come along and show WHY it works. They require that you show the science behind any change to their testing procedures. Bob, that takes R&D money, not just that it does. As we are a small company, we must dedicate our R&D dollars where they will do the most good. At the moment that is in further development of a product that can and does save money."
Since I am limited to 1 post/day, I can not comment on "replies".
