InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 217
Posts 28308
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 02/24/2002

Re: sambass post# 2502

Friday, 01/04/2013 8:00:51 PM

Friday, January 04, 2013 8:00:51 PM

Post# of 17759
Wouldn't the executing of warrants raise enough money for govt to get paid back + recapitalize them?

The govt's balance sheet shows it owning warrants for ownership of 79.9% of Fannie and Freddie, and senior preferred stock in the amount of about $188 billion. If the government exercised the warrants no new capital is created for FnF. If they sold the warrants the funds would flow to the treasury; still no capital to FNF.

There is one paragraph in the terms sheet from that fateful day in September 2008;

These agreements are the most effective means of averting systemic risk and contain terms and
conditions to protect the taxpayer. They are more efficient than a one-time equity injection, in that
Treasury will use them only as needed and on terms that the Treasury deems appropriate.



"only as needed" This fits in somewhat with the net investment theory. Once we pay dividends equal to the amounts of senior preferreds issued, could the gov't cancel the Senior preferreds and sell the warrants as it's "profit" due the taxpayers for the use of their funds, and Fnf could start building capital from earnings. Once the net investment is paid back, are the Senior Preferreds no longer needed.

Just thinking out loud after a long day.
I hope some bought those MLP's I mentioned the other day.

OT:

We have been looking at and buying some beaten up MLPs. BPT, CRT, SBR, MVO, and MARPS specifically. My trading partners and I think they may have experienced some tax loss selling that has put some abnormal selling pressure on them. Might be worth a look going into the new year.


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=82952879&txt2find=marps

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent FNMAS News