Good Lord, man.
Obssessed much? Had I known I would be quoted ad nauseum, I would never have mentioned it. You make it all sound much sexier than it really is.
Specifically I had been talking about Paul's comments on the (exact) similarities between Vocaltec and Telatinos PR. According to Serf, Paul said the reasons behind the similarities would be explained soon enough, or something to that effect. My opinion is that Paul was deliberately trying to keep the bad news (i.e. the fact that the company's press was cut-and-pasted and fabricated) away from shareholders until the stock had been milked dry and IPxes had been "sprung," thereby eliminating questions about the company's "technology," it having been "removed to a private corporation" and all. lmfao. 10:1 IPxes is the name of Paul's cat.
The other shady rumor Paul TRIED to spread through Serf, although, once again, Serf was smart enough to keep from spreading this publicly, was the fact that IPxes was signing contract upon contract even beyond those that had already been announced. IMO, this was Paul's attempt to spread good word of mouth among the potential investors, but without putting out any more false press. And of course, these were "IPxes" contracts. He knew full well that they would be sprung and shareholders would never see a dime of those revenues, if they existed.
That's about it. Nothing major is being withheld as far as I know. Once again, you're barking up the wrong tree. Why must you continually deflect attention towards Serf. Let's keep our eyes on the prize, shall we. The big man should be the target here, not fellow mushrooms.