InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 812
Posts 29861
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 03/08/2003

Re: sgolds post# 485

Tuesday, 03/11/2003 6:30:31 AM

Tuesday, March 11, 2003 6:30:31 AM

Post# of 97565
You were correct, sgolds. It was information gleaned only from the monthly closes. I considered no other information, other then adjustments for splits and dividends. And, in the case of many stocks that I've examined they have neither-especially the penny stocks. At this point in time the revolving quarterly is fascinating with its exaggeration of value from month to month, quarter to quarter. But, it is still only a tool to be used in conjunction with a host of other tools. The charts appear to be self-explanatory. I have sent the program to some on the message board, but only one has returned for more friendlier chats. I guess the EXCEL program needs more fine tuning.
It was one of those things that excited me and confused me, too. Once I discovered it and began adjustting my templates more-what appeared to be strength-began to unfold. It just seemed too rich a concept when a stock, any stock can go 12 years through the good times and the bad, and not having a losing quarter among them to be coincidental. See you. And, thanks for understanding. I had offered my insight of other stocks that I did on the other message boards, I think 4 different stocks, and have been misunderstood. Maybe, when the Revolving Quarterly book comes out, people will understand. It was just a tool and can never replace an advisor.

Ken


#board-1616 & #board-3424 Seasonals rock.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News