Obviously, selling shares at $2 or more is that much better than $1. But > $1.00 is enough, especially in combination with any other measure to limit the marginal cap ex needed. The pledge alone, with some credible execution plans would help the share price. Also, they do not have to wait until April to signal FY 2013 results. The can pre-announce a range January or February, if they want, before the FN listing.
IMO, the company has a ways to go before "deserving" a "fair" value over $2.00 beyond simply deferring dilution. But they will tick off those milestones: free cash flow; 1/4 Billion revenues and NTA, dragonhead sub status, etc.
It's ironic, or at least unusual, that operational performance is the least of my concerns, as a shareholder.
Thing is, we do not know what commitments have been made a while ago.
Not necessarily. He has pretty strict legal constraints about what he can say. He did allow, in the same breath, that there are alternatives to straight share issuance.
He has not acknowledged that he can take his foot off the dilution accelerator. I don't understand why he can't and why he would not lighten up -- if need be -- by any of the ways I suggested. But, he may be committed, to some extent.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.