InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 937
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2007

Re: Gregory_ post# 8546

Monday, 12/17/2012 11:17:35 PM

Monday, December 17, 2012 11:17:35 PM

Post# of 12573
Here is a weak attempt at some numbers for TPW:

LSG's cost is less than $800 / oz in 2013 (based on prior posts).
Gold is about $1,700 right now, leaving about $900 / oz potential profit. Let's presume it stays there and does not drop to $1,000 again or skyrocket to $2,500. (I would bet on the latter.)

I cannot recall the cost of infrastructure at LSG's mine, but I believe it was $250,000,000. I really cannot recall for sure. That is VERY relevant, whatever it is. I would not expect EXS to build a mine, but it is relevant in terms of how interested a major would be.

1M oz (what we have now)
----------------------------
1M oz - $900,000,000 in profit (based on $800 cost at $1,700 Au)
10 year LOM (life of mine) - $90M profit a year
20 year LOM - $45M profit a year

1.5M oz (what we soon hope to have)
----------------------------
1.5M oz - $1,350,000,000 in profit
10 year LOM - $135M profit a year
20 year LOM - $67.5M profit a year

3M oz (what we hope to have by the end of 2013)
----------------------------
3M oz - $2,700,000,000 in profit
10 year LOM - $270M profit a year
20 year LOM - $135M profit a year

30M oz (believed to be the potential for the deposit)
----------------------------
30M oz - $27,000,000,000 in profit
10 year LOM - $2.7B profit a year
20 year LOM - $1.35B profit a year

So, with all of that (mostly) utter nonsense said, if CD is right, and we are sitting on top of a 30M oz deposit, what do you think a major would pay for it?

Even $2 seems cheap. $2 * 180M shares = $360M market cap

From a recent interview with Rick Rule, he stated investments in the current market need a 3 year payback to interest him.
"We would rather see you do something that generated a 30% IRR with reasonable amounts of capital where you pay back the capital in three years." - Rick Rule, http://www.theaureport.com/pub/na/14773

Let us be modest then and consider a few things. If we look at a 1.5M deposit at approximately $135M in profit a year, that would mean they could possibly pay 3 years of that less the cost to develop the mine. 3 * 135M = $405M. If the mine costs $500M to create, well... that does not paint a rosy picture here. If we are looking at a $250M mine cost, it may be worthwhile. This is why the cost of the LSG mine is very important. (Can anyone help here?)

$405M profit in 3 years - $250M mine cost = $155M purchase
$155M purchase / 180M shares fully diluted = 0.8611 / share
$0.8611 / 0.11 (today's closing price) = 782% gain

If we bump it up to a 3M deposit:
$270M profit a year * 3 years = $810M
$810M - $250M mine cost = $560M purchase
$560M / 180M shares = $3.11 / share
$3.11 / 0.11 (today's closing price) = 2,827% gain

This is all exclusive of something happening at Kidd Creek, which is what I am really watching. My expectation is that Kidd Creek will steal the show, in the end, but that is all completely speculation.

Understand the present. Create your future.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.