InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 6229
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 05/11/2006

Re: greenhornet post# 207382

Sunday, 12/16/2012 7:21:06 PM

Sunday, December 16, 2012 7:21:06 PM

Post# of 312016
Going to watch the machines would yield the following:

1) Pyrolysis works. Plastic goes in and fuel comes out. Even, if I stayed there for 3 weeks camping out it would not answer the real question. Can these typical pyrolysis machines churn out enough fuel that is sold to make the company commercially viable? The only place you can really see that question being answered with authority are the SEC filings. If you remember all the company visitors of quarters past were dazzled to the point of making claims that today look downright goofy, Boots on the ground reports have been horribly misleading even from this year. I laugh at how the reports are always 3 tankers a day.

And just as an aside, it has nothing to do with the company showing a "profit". That makes it sound like the machines have actually run close to what Bordynuik has claimed for 3 years and how they just missed making a pofit. Nothing could be further from reality. Instead I am saying it would be useful if they could run the machines and sell the equivalent of more than just a few weeks of production every quarter. I mean how could you possibly disagree?

If you are seriously interested in my opinion, read my other posts. I think I lay with much more clarity than most what defines success.