"Zeev could say what ever biased thing he wants. That is why I try and provide as many links as possible from as many neutral sources as possible (even Israeli sources). So I asked for a link. Not a link to Zeev's biased words. But a link from a neutral media source. I hope your news media source isn't just Zeev's word..."
Posting an Israeli source does not make it unbiased. Israel, having freedom of speech, has a wide variety of points of view. The fact that the ones that you choose to quote all agree with you suggests that they were selected by you according to whether they agree with you.
All of the Jewish ones that I've seen you quote have a very obvious point of view, and I have never seen them post anything that does not support that point of view. That is not a neutral source. A neutral source is one that does not select its facts according to whether they support a particular point of view. It's easy to tell the difference, because everything that is published by a biased source supports their point of view. That is not true of a neutral source.
I happen to think that Zeev has integrity enough, and ability enough, to consistently post data that is from reliable sources. That is why I am willing to accept his numbers as being at least approximately right. If you aren't, fine, but that does not prove that his numbers are wrong. At most it proves that the correct numbers have not been established.
AI
