InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 42
Posts 910
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/18/2012

Re: newmedman post# 55272

Sunday, 12/02/2012 11:34:31 AM

Sunday, December 02, 2012 11:34:31 AM

Post# of 238152
Medman your points are all valid thoughts I have no issues with them and yes I would really like to see them validated one way or the other I think that is in the best interest of eveyone who has a stake in them.

I do wonder about the gum.......why have clinical trials? This is the CBD gum correct and not the THC gum? Even if it was one or the other or both.....why not get it out there....I don't think Dixie took clinical trials before producing their product or any other product....what for? Get a good logo for it some good marketing for the wrapper and put it on the shelves.

My thoughts on that are with the Dutch doctors who held the patent. They must have been adamant to go this route and either it was in the contract with them or MJNA caved and allow them to go this route.....remember as I understand it this was not decided until after ML was out.

I would like to hear some discussion on the reasoning for the delay in production and clinical trials route......and I got the pharma part of it and it does not make sense to me.

Thanks all....looking for comments and thanks for your insight medman.