Friday, November 30, 2012 12:47:29 AM
Just as the Court found laches, on his own initiative, he could POTENTIALLY disallow prejudgment interest. What I'm seeing, at this point, and I haven't read through all of this, is that the Court found laches, but the damages for past infringement are awarded. I'm going to have to read this closely, and actually look at the Supreme Court cases cited to form my own, personal, opinion.
Folks have to understand that court opinions, even Supreme Court opinions, are subject to interpretation. You find a blurb you like, you jump all over it.
Past my bed time. Good shot across the bow by the GOOG attorneys, and I would expect no less. I'm not dishearted by what I have read so far. VRNG has a week to respond, and they will do so accordingly.
Nite all. I've been a little ill and just can't hang with this any more tonight. Surgery in January. I'm just really tired.
JJ
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM