Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[kpf]

Rink

Never mind. No personal offense taken. :)


It seems that what you're saying is actually quite close to what we said

Well, halfway so, actually there is two considerations I intended to add when shifting focus away from units in crossover:

1. Taking shifts in Intels inventories into account
2. Suggesting there is no performance increase to expect from 65nm for quite a while for Pentium4 and Xeons. (What Intel recently disclosed about a "second generation 65nm process" - well a different process number at least - supports this)

Maybe this was not evident at first glance in the synopsis my internal translator produced for Intels statement you cited. :)

K.