FDIC haggle prior to ruling=DucKnCoveR?
"Since the filing of the Motion, Debtors’ counsel and counsel for the FDIC-Receiver have been actively engaged in discussions about how to resolve the matter."
Maybe am missing something here (am the first to admit it), but why in the world would the FDIC-R even have dialog, outside the court, over an issue which they so staunchly hold (FDIC full claim to refund over taxes they never paid..go figure -saw the same with Washington Mutual).
Let the BK judge decide. No need for fruitless private discusses, right? This pacer document should not even exist.
And even better, why not pursue a strategy to delay a decision on the matter till after Judge Amy Jackson rules on summary judgement. This would only bolster the FDIC's ownership claim, and would obviously be based on the confidence the FDIC has in the OCC case with United Western bank. They do have that?
Uninvited Guest, thanks for posting this from Pacer. Makes me glad am locked-and-loaded!
