Tornado Alley (PROG)

[StephanieVanbryce]

,,,,,,,and here is just 'one' reason ... that people have a 'bad' taste in their mouth regarding capitalism...this one reason resonates with many of these big guys that we have heard from over the past four years .... so I could use any of them .. . however, he just spoke a couple of days ago ... again.

Goldman Sachs CEO: Entitlements must be contained

Scott Pelley
November 19, 2012

(CBS News) Stocks shook off their post-election slump Monday, in part because of optimism that the president and Congress will reach a compromise on the nation's budget by the end of the year.

If they don't, there will be automatic tax increases and huge cuts in federal spending -- that so-called fiscal cliff.

It's a time bomb, according to Lloyd Blankfein, chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, and one of the world's most influential bankers. His message to Washington? Make a deal.

BLANKFEIN: Their job is to make the country function, not to -- it's not a winning game, it's a get-along game.

PELLEY: Washington playing with fire?

BLANKFEIN: Yes.

An interview with Lloyd Blankfein is as rare as a look inside the Goldman Sachs money machine. He showed us one of seven trading floors at his Manhattan headquarters. Goldman is one of America's most successful investment banks. It had net earnings of $4.4 billion dollars last year. When we asked Blankfein how to reduce the federal budget deficit, he went straight for the subject politicians don't want to talk about.

BLANKFEIN: You're going to have to undoubtedly do something to lower people's expectations -- the entitlements and what people think that they're going to get, because it's not going to -- they're not going to get it.

PELLEY: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid?

BLANKFEIN: You can look at history of these things, and Social Security wasn't devised to be a system that supported you for a 30-year retirement after a 25-year career. ... So there will be things that, you know, the retirement age has to be changed, maybe some of the benefits have to be affected, maybe some of the inflation adjustments have to be revised. But in general, entitlements have to be slowed down and contained.

PELLEY: Because we can't afford them going forward?

BLANKFEIN: Because we can't afford them.

We wondered whether he thinks the government needs more revenue in the form of higher taxes.

BLANKFEIN: In the long run, there has to be more revenue. And, of course, the burden of that revenue will be disproportionately taken up by wealthier people. That's just logical.

PELLEY: So higher taxes on wealthier people?

BLANKFEIN: More taxes on wealthier people, to the extent that we need to raise more revenue, and we do need to raise some more revenue.

PELLEY: Why is an increase in revenue, in tax money, necessary? Why can't you just cut your way out of the deficit?

BLANKFEIN: For sure certain people in this country wouldn't like the society you would have if you did that, and personally, I don't think I would like it either, if we went as far as to close our entire budget deficit in that way.

PELLEY: What kind of society would it be?

BLANKFEIN: I think it would be one where the safety net would be more porous and lower to the ground.

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57552173/goldman-sachs-ceo-entitlements-must-be-contained/

Mr. Blankfein, did you ever think about receiving a higher tax rate .. like say 49% .. then you could give up some special tax breaks and a higher tax on investment earnings AND a higher corporate tax rate and how about a transaction tax, sound good? ... .. and then they wonder why people are not happy with banks or capitalism, sheeesh! he so casually talks about ending any safety net for the 98 percent .. that truly it just makes you wonder ... if he lives in the same world as everyone else ..

btw, F6, AGAIN, thank you for that wonderful post .. I will be sorry to see 'campaign stops' go ... they wrote a many great articles .. about just exactly what was going on .. including all the absurdities ... I will miss all of the writers .. .. ;) I also read your entire post, it's just that first one was so excellent and informative .. ;) .. thank you again .