Cannabis Science Inc (fka CBIS)

[ShiddyMcDiddy]

Might want to highlight this line next time..."However, if the defendant does not intend it to be conveyed to anyone other than the plaintiff, and conveys it in a manner that ordinarily would prevent others from seeing or hearing it, the requirement of publication has not been satisfied even if a third party inadvertently overhears or witnesses the communication." - Rifreede

Publication is an element needed to prove the defamation. What you said I should highlight next time does not apply to you as your comments meet the element of publication. Your comments were not in a private email to CBIS that someone intercepted (ie. your comments were not intended to be conveyed to 3rd parties); rather, your comments are shouted to many parties on an on-line bulletin board.

Savvy?

How are your false and accusatory comments about CBIS done in manner that would ordinarily prevent others from seeing or hearing them? HINT: they aren't.