Avid Bioservices Inc (CDMO)

[nuke661]

CP,

You stated:

Which parties could have made the errors leading to the discrepancies?
Theoretically CSM, one of its sub-contractors or one of the manufacturers providing Bavi, Placebo or the SOC product. But for our case we can exclude all but CSM. Why! Because CSM is responsible for ALL sub-contractors and deliveries it receives and redistributes, EVEN those coming from Avid. CSM is responsible to test deliveries and make sure they are what the manufactures claim they are. This guarantees that Avid could not deliver some stronger Bavi version (if that would exist) or that the SOC manufacturer doesn't change anything to his product that would invalidate the trial or that the placebo is the placebo decided upon in the trial design.

Regarding the bolded and italicized statement; Do you know this for a fact and if so how do you know this as a fact?

Thanks CP.