InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5
Posts 475
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2012

Re: Protector post# 101375

Friday, 11/09/2012 9:26:09 AM

Friday, November 09, 2012 9:26:09 AM

Post# of 346654
I think we may be talking past each other.

If the alleged private email from IR set forth a "weeks not months" time frame for the following statement - "Peregrine intends to communicate further as soon as it is able to determine the impact of this issue" - and the follow up communication has indeed been made, then what, precisely, is the impact?

The Oct. 17th PR does not appear to make any statement that can fairly be construed to address the "impact" of the trial discrepancies. So if IR made a prior promise to anyone to issue such a statement in "weeks," it is still outstanding. The other possibility is that they never really promised anyone that they would comment on the "impact" in "weeks." This is why I would like to see that text of the actual email. I do recall a post by Fire Fox, but I couldn't find it (apparently it was deleted). I also reviewed the posts from Sept 24 to Sept 26, where I found references to the "weeks not months" post, but could not find the original post (No easy task the way iHub is set up, so I may have missed it.) Accordingly, if anyone has an email (or a transcript thereof) from IR that establishes a "weeks not months" time frame, it would be entirely appropriate to repost it here. Otherwise, the entire topic, imho, was just message board noise and not worthy of spin either way.


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent CDMO News