InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 19122
Next 10
Followers 800
Posts 56098
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 08/11/2002

Re: elsieCat post# 2281

Saturday, 10/15/2005 11:19:10 AM

Saturday, October 15, 2005 11:19:10 AM

Post# of 19122
Elsie....

You wrote: "It doesn't look too good to me to announce a new study without announcing the results of the second." Hmmm...

Healthy scepticism and negativity are close cousins. I don't have the same feelings as you. I also want the first study to be completed, as I have said, but I don't feel the need to connect the two in order to assess the validity of going ahead with the second.

Did it occur to you that the Uranium 'study' is probably not connected at all to the first Mineral study, or that the first may not be finished yet, for any variety of reasons, including funding (I alluded to this possibility in a previous post}, and that to include for same in this NR may be premature?

What's to stop EKWN-X from having thirty studies going on, all simultanteously, all in different stages of development, each separately funded, each totally unconnected? In fact, I welcome EKWX getting busier. This is precisely what we want.

Have you listened to Ed Godin's radio broadcast, available in the header of this BB? The idea he expresses is that once they get active in funded studies, a mine will be found. It's that simple. The more studies that get underway, the faster a mine will be found.

Again, my understanding is that this second area of activity is associated with a group having approached Mr. Godin with an expression of interest in working with EKWX on the issue of potential Uranium discoveries, given the ability of HIT to avoid the pitfalls of spending analytical time on barren pipes. They were not mentioned in the PR, but I will be digging this week to find out more behind this story.

fringe