ok i cant put the sharade up any longer
the congress bridge was closed, i was trying to trick you into
saying you took it, that was part of the reason of my
frustration, i figured id pressure you and you to gain
credibility would just pick the route i had clamed i had
taken. I mailed a link to droy talking about how the bridge
was closed unless you figured out the sting and called me on
it...that way it wouldnt look like i was the one that was
full of it
but truely u need to try to lighten up on the company a bit
those guys were for real, the feed back was real they
didnt try to cover anything up or bs out gargbage...
if there is anything any one should get from all of this
go-round on ASNAP is that you cannot say ASNAP is just here
or just there, for ASNAP to be truely be it must be almost
everywhere, ASNAP comes into existance when all components
are active in the system,
components can have ASNAP installed in spite of all this
we all know this, there is no need to bash on that point
clearly the simplest scenario is having a provider that is
fully ASNAP compliant that can provide both access points and
handsets to customers, once the first hanset seamlessly
roams to a wifi access point w/ a tabulated cost reduction/
share, then at that point ASNAP will be truely alive
untill then it will only be components that have ASNAP
p2k
AI
