News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 257265
Next 10
Followers 843
Posts 122806
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: io_io post# 16879

Thursday, 10/13/2005 8:22:45 PM

Thursday, October 13, 2005 8:22:45 PM

Post# of 257265
Re: GTCB, Merrimack

>>Do we have any idea what GTCB's cut would be if one of it's partner's drugs was to enter the market post-approval?<<

MM-093 is the furthest along of any of GTC’s external programs, but I doubt that the post-approval terms have been fully negotiated yet. Still, we can guess at what the terms will end up being.

GTC will probably get a mid-single-digit royalty on sales—for Merrimack’s use of GTC’s IP—and a markup on GTC’s fully-allocated production costs for product that GTC sells to Merrimack. For the cost-of-goods mark-up, the industry standard is about 10%. If, for the sake of discussion, we say that GTC’s fully-allocated COGS will be 15% of the end-user selling price of MM-093, then the COGS mark-up is economically equivalent to a 1.5% royalty on sales over and above the royalty that will be earned for Merrimack’s use of GTC’s IP. Hence, the overall economic value of the deal might be equivalent to a high-single-digit royalty on sales.

Eventually, these kinds of arrangements could provide a highly consequential income stream for a company of GTC’s size.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today