InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 153
Posts 12276
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/02/2007

Re: Rawnoc post# 202444

Saturday, 11/03/2012 1:26:36 PM

Saturday, November 03, 2012 1:26:36 PM

Post# of 312016
The 1st comparison point-- visual appearance -- is silly. Aside from continuing to reference information not contained in Agilyx's Air Permit, I don't think even if one had the calculated gel, cloud and pour points (Agilyx's states their pour point is 24° - 30° Celsius) it would mean anything.

The 2nd comparison point-- gross/net estimates and comparison to crude pricing -- would be fair if we had complete numbers. You're rounding up to get the highest Agilyx net number and comparing it to an estimated JBI gross number; therefore it is an incomplete/faulty comparison. Further, I have no idea what you are using to reference the suggested discount and premium % to crude pricing.