InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 733
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/23/2012

Re: None

Thursday, 11/01/2012 2:54:27 PM

Thursday, November 01, 2012 2:54:27 PM

Post# of 68424
Reprint of PrincetonATTY44

Unfortunately very few people on this board realize that the Laches ruling was incorrect and amounts to a "fast track" appeal by the Appellate Court. Judge Jackson effectively granted a Motion on Laches by Google where none existed. I repeat there was no filed motion. Any 2rd year Law Student would have caught that one. Then to follow it up not allowing the Plaintiff rebuttal outside of Proffer is frankly, unbecoming of a Federal Judge. This one comes back. No question. No doubt. No Argument