InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 380
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/01/2010

Re: None

Tuesday, 10/30/2012 7:59:33 PM

Tuesday, October 30, 2012 7:59:33 PM

Post# of 12054
courtesy of JonnyQwan Raging Bull #338831:

New Pacer out of San Francisco....


I think interwoven is really starting to pi$$ off Judge Seeborg!!!!


IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
INTERWOVEN, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
No. CV 10-04645 RS
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
SEAL AND SETTING HEARING
DATE FOR MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff filed an administrative motion to file portions of a summary judgment motion
under seal. The redacted motion for summary judgment indicated plaintiff contemplated a
November 29, 2012 hearing date for the substantive motion. However, plaintiff failed to
properly notice that date and, as a result, the hearing has not been set. That date is now closed.
Consequently, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment shall be heard on December 13, 2012 at
1:30 p.m.
Furthermore, most, if not all, of the information plaintiff has requested be filed under seal
does not meet the requirements of Civil Local Rule 79-5. Simply designating documents as
“highly confidential” during the discovery process does not entitle them to be filed under seal in
court. Plaintiff’s motion to file under seal is denied without prejudice to re-file an appropriately
“narrowly tailored” request.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Case3:10-cv-04645-RS Document131 Filed10/30/12 Page1 of 2
NO. 12-CV-00014 RS


ORDER
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
Dated: 10/30/12
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Coup D'oeil

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.